← NEWS
✦ Health · TrueWire

Sha Responds To Africa Uncensored Documentary On Mti System

img_tag = ("") if image_text else ""

The Social Health Authority has broken its silence on explosive claims that its payment system deliberately keeps ordinary Kenyans in higher contribution brackets while the wealthy dodge fair payments.

SHA officials are pushing back against a hard-hitting Africa Uncensored documentary that exposed serious flaws in the Means Testing Instrument (MTI) – the system that determines how much each Kenyan pays for the new health scheme. The authority insists the MTI fairly assesses contributions based on income and circumstances, but critics argue the system punishes middle-class families while letting the rich slip through cracks.

The documentary painted a damning picture of how a bodaboda rider in Nairobi might end up paying more than a wealthy businessman simply because of how the MTI categories work. For millions of Kenyans already struggling with the cost of living, these revelations hit particularly hard. Many families are choosing between SHA contributions and basic needs like school fees or rent – decisions no parent should have to make.

What makes this controversy even more painful is the timing. Kenyans were promised that SHA would fix the problems of the old NHIF system, where corruption and mismanagement left patients stranded at hospital doors. Instead, many feel they are paying more for a system that still does not deliver the healthcare they desperately need. The matatu driver rushing a sick child to Kenyatta Hospital should not worry about whether SHA will cover treatment after faithfully paying contributions every month.

The technical details of the MTI might sound complicated, but the impact on ordinary families is crystal clear. When a teacher in Mombasa pays the same rate as a county commissioner, something is fundamentally wrong with the formula. SHA's response acknowledges some concerns but stops short of admitting the system needs major reforms. They promise ongoing improvements, but Kenyans have heard similar promises before.

County governments are also watching this controversy closely, as they partner with SHA to deliver healthcare services at the grassroots level. If the contribution system collapses or faces mass resistance, it is the local dispensaries and county hospitals that will bear the brunt. Rural communities, who depend heavily on these facilities, cannot afford another healthcare system failure.

SHA now faces a credibility crisis that threatens the entire universal healthcare dream. The authority must choose between defending a flawed system or admitting mistakes and fixing them transparently. The real question is whether ordinary Kenyans will continue paying into a system they believe is rigged against them – and what happens to our healthcare if they stop?