President William Ruto is hitting back hard at critics spreading what he calls "propaganda" about teachers and civil servants rejecting the Social Health Authority, claiming the reports are completely false and funded by people who made millions from the old NHIF system.
Speaking during a public event, Ruto dismisses the circulating reports as baseless lies designed to sabotage the government's healthcare reforms. The President insists that teachers and civil servants across the country are actually embracing SHA, contradicting widespread media reports and union statements suggesting resistance to the new system. He directly accuses former NHIF beneficiaries of funding a disinformation campaign to protect their lost revenue streams.
The pushback comes as thousands of Kenyans continue struggling to access healthcare services under the new SHA system, with many reporting difficulties registering or getting treatment at public hospitals. Teachers' unions and civil servants' organizations have publicly raised concerns about the transition, citing confusion over benefits and delayed processing of claims that affect their members' ability to get medical care.
For ordinary Kenyans who depend on public healthcare, this back-and-forth creates real anxiety about whether they can actually get treatment when they need it. Many families are stuck between a system that supposedly no longer exists and a new one they cannot fully access, leaving them wondering whether to risk going to hospital or just hope their M-Pesa savings can cover private treatment.
The President's strong defense of SHA suggests the government recognizes the political danger of a healthcare system that doesn't work for the people who voted for change. With county hospitals serving as the backbone of healthcare for millions of Kenyans who cannot afford private facilities, any failure in the system directly impacts the government's credibility on its promises to improve ordinary citizens' lives.
Ruto's claim that opposition to SHA is funded by corrupt NHIF beneficiaries attempts to frame criticism as selfish rather than genuine concern for public welfare. This strategy aims to discredit union leaders and health experts who have raised technical questions about the new system's readiness and functionality.
The real test will be whether Kenyans can actually walk into any public hospital and get the treatment they need without the bureaucratic nightmares many are reporting – will SHA prove its critics wrong through results, or will the President's words ring hollow when families face medical emergencies?