← NEWS
✦ General · TrueWire

No Money For Us Billions For The Presidency

img_tag = ("") if image_text else ""

President William Ruto's administration has allocated a staggering Sh71.3 billion to State House and the Executive Office of the President in the current financial year, even as ordinary Kenyans grapple with increased taxes and reduced government services. The massive allocation—Sh36.3 billion for State House alone and Sh35 billion for the Executive Office—dwarfs funding for critical sectors and raises questions about the government's spending priorities during tough economic times.

The eye-watering figures emerge as Ruto's government simultaneously implements punitive tax measures that have squeezed household budgets across the country. From the controversial housing levy to increased fuel taxes, Kenyans are paying more while the presidency enjoys unprecedented funding levels that exceed allocations to entire ministries handling health, education, and infrastructure.

State House's Sh36.3 billion allocation represents a significant increase from previous years and could fund major development projects in counties starved of resources. To put this in perspective, the entire allocation for the Ministry of Health stands at Sh113 billion, meaning the presidency alone consumes nearly two-thirds of what the government spends on healthcare for 50 million Kenyans.

The Executive Office of the President's additional Sh35 billion brings the total presidential allocation to levels that critics describe as excessive and tone-deaf. This amount could construct thousands of classrooms, equip hospitals, or provide clean water to communities that have waited decades for basic services. Instead, it flows to an office already criticized for its bloated structure and numerous advisers.

These allocations come at a time when county governments struggle with delayed disbursements and reduced funding, forcing governors to scale back development projects and service delivery. The contrast between presidential luxury and county-level austerity highlights growing inequality in government spending that directly impacts service delivery to ordinary citizens.

Civil society groups and opposition leaders are already questioning how the presidency justifies such massive expenditure while preaching austerity to other government departments. The allocations also contradict Ruto's campaign promises of fiscal discipline and his repeated calls for Kenyans to tighten their belts during the current economic downturn.

Parliament now faces pressure to scrutinize these allocations during budget debates, with MPs expected to demand detailed breakdowns of how the presidency intends to spend Sh71.3 billion. Public interest groups are also likely to mount legal challenges, arguing that such excessive presidential spending violates principles of prudent public finance management and threatens service delivery in essential sectors.